United States v. Mermelstein

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• excluding evidence of unrelated alteration of medical chart where court considered most likely use of the evidence would be “as proof of [defendant’s] propensity for altering the medical records of his patients.”
• health care fraud and health care false statements properly charged as continuing offenses

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).