United States v. Stanley Friedman, Michael Lazar, Lester Shafran, and Marvin Kaplan, Defendants

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that “the reading of testimony may violate an order excluding witnesses issued by a district court under Rule 615”
• concluding that dismissal of an indictment is inappropriate where a defendant \simply cannot show resultant prejudice\
• concluding that dismissal of an indictment is inappropriate where a defendant ʺsimply cannot show resultant prejudiceʺ
• concluding that prejudicial spillover did not exist where the government's subsequently invalid theory of mail fraud was not inflammatory
• explaining that \no matter how pervasively the rules concerning grand jury secrecy\ were violated, those violations would not warrant dismissal absent a showing of prejudice
• noting that appellant's claim of prejudice due to judicial misconduct was contradicted by failure to request mistrial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).