United States v. Kevin v. Leroy and John Hitchings, Jr.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the government was not required to disclose allegedly exculpatory grand jury testimony where the defendant “was on notice of the facts necessary for him to take advantage of such exculpatory testimony as [the identified witnesses] might conceivably furnish”
• rejecting Brady claim where the Government had given Defendant notice of “the essential facts permitting him to take advantage of any exculpatory evidence”
• finding no Brady violation when defendant knew of the witnesses’ identity and could have subpoenaed the witnesses to testify at trial
• finding no Brady violation when defendant knew of the witnesses’ identity and could have subpoenaed the witnesses to testify at trial
• illegal kickbacks received by union official because of his status were sufficiently related to the enterprise
• illegal kickbacks received by union official because of his status were sufficiently related to the enterprise

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).