Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
Eleventh Circuit· 8/3/2004

United States v. Levy

Citations

  • 379 F.3d 1241
  • 2004 WL 1725406

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that an issue is waived if not in an initial brief
  • explaining that we do not “consider issues raised for the first time in an appellant’s reply brief”
  • stating that arguments not made in an appellant’s initial brief are abandoned
  • concluding language of Rule 28(j) “underscores that an appellant’s supplemental authority must relate to an issue previously raised in a proper fashion, and that an appellant cannot raise a wholly new issue in a supplemental authority letter or brief’
  • collecting cases and noting “this Court . . . repeatedly has refused to consider issues raised for the first time in an appellant’s reply brief”
  • refusing to “entertain new issue” when party did not “timely raise it in his initial brief on appeal”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Anderson, Hull, Pryor

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

53 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

36 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named United States v. Levy

36 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.