Skip to main content
· 4/15/2005

United States v. Donna R. Day

Citations

  • 405 F.3d 1293
  • 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 6342
  • 2005 WL 858294

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • treating issues and contentions raised for the first time in a reply brief as waived or abandoned
  • rejecting the defendant’s argument that she did not know her co-conspirators were targeting the vulnerable victims because the evidence showed that she had a role in selecting the victims
  • describing abandoned claims as “waived or abandoned”
  • judge’s engagement with witness testimony

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Marcus, Fay, Siler

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.