Skip to main content
· 10/22/2001

Carol Wilkerson v. Grinnell Corporation

Citations

  • 270 F.3d 1314
  • 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 22604
  • 81 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 40,783
  • 89 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 579
  • 2001 WL 1262325

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that signing intake questionnaire under penalty of perjury satisfies charge-verification requirement of Title VII and EEOC regulations
  • concluding that sworn intake questionnaire contained sufficient in- formation to constitute a charge
  • holding verified questionnaire sufficient to satisfy the charge requirement of Title VU’s statute of limitations
  • stating that “since [the plaintiff] did not raise this issue until her supplemental reply brief, we deem it abandoned”
  • explaining that claim was abandoned and affirming grant of summary judgment as to claim presented in complaint but not raised in plaintiff’s initial response to summary judgment motion
  • noting that to sue under Title VII a plaintiff must first exhaust administrative remedies

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Birch, Cox, Alarcon

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.