Mamone v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that § 2255 cannot be utilized by a federal prisoner to challenge the restitution portion of his sentence
• concluding that 28 U.S.C. § 2255 cannot be used to raise a collateral challenge to noncustodial punishments
• upholding trial court’s refusal to entertain prisoner’s claim challenging legality of restitution order in federal habeas petition
• “[W]e will not address an argument raised for the first time in a reply brief.”
• “claims seeking relief other than release from custody cannot be brought pursuant to § 2255.”
• despite the presence of claims challenging his custody and requesting release from custody, prisoner could not utilize § 2255 to challenge his restitution order

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).