Big Top Koolers, Inc. v. Circus-Man Snacks, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that we “review the district court’s denial of a Rule 60(b) motion for an abuse of discretion”
• declining “to address an argument advanced by [a party] for the first time in a reply brief”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).