Melissa K. Little v. T-Mobile USA, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining a plaintiff seeking class certification must satisfy the implicit and explicit requirements of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23
• stating the existence of an ascertainable class of persons to be represented by the class representative is an implicit prerequisite of Rule 23
• collecting binding cases which hold arguments not raised in the opening brief are waived
• “A district court abuses its discretion if it ... applies the law in an unreasonable or incorrect manner.”
• mentioning ascertainability but ruling under Rule 23(b)(3)’s predominance standard
• denying certification because class was overbroad

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).