Skip to main content
· 4/23/2012

Thacker v. Workman

Citations

  • 678 F.3d 820
  • 2012 WL 1383918
  • 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 8165

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that “cumulative-error in the federal habeas context applies only where there are two or more actual constitutional errors”
  • noting that “cumulative-error in the federal habeas context applies only where there are two or more actual constitutional errors”
  • recognizing Oklahoma’s waiver rule as an independent and adequate procedural rule for purposes of barring federal habeas review
  • “Because, however, Thacker’s [habeas] claim is procedurally barred, the district court did not err in failing to conduct an evidentiary hearing.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Briscoe, O'Brien, Matheson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.