United States v. Frank M. Oakley

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Arguments raised for the first time in a reply brief are not properly before the reviewing court.”
• “Arguments raised for the first time in a reply brief are not properly before the reviewing court.”
• “Arguments raised for the first time in a reply brief are not properly before the reviewing court.”
• “Cross-motions for summary judgment will not, in themselves, warrant the court granting summary judgment unless one of the parties is entitled to judgment as a matter of law on facts that are not genuinely disputed.”
• “Cross-motions…will not, in themselves, warrant the court in granting summary judgment unless one of the parties is entitled to judgment as a matter of law on facts that are not genuinely disputed.” (alteration added; citation omitted)
• “Cross-motions for summary judgment will not, in themselves, warrant the court in granting summary judgment unless one of the parties is entitled to judgment as a matter of law on facts that are not genuinely disputed.”(quotation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).