United States v. Thomas Edward Karam

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “[a] negative net worth at the time of sentencing [did] not necessarily indicate an inability to pay,” where the PSR established that defendant was “well-educated” and had “extensive [work] experience”
• \A civil settlement does not preclude an award of restitution under [the Act] because restitution under [it] is primarily penal in nature.\
• “A negative net worth at the time of sentencing does not necessarily indi- cate an inability to pay, especially when the PSR establishes that a defendant has knowledge and skills in the areas of fi- nancial planning, business administration and corporate strategies.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).