Skip to main content
· 2/18/1999

United States v. Ernest J. Szarwark

Citations

  • 168 F.3d 993
  • 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 2465

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that courts must consider “full scope of the scheme when determining the sufficiency of the mailing element”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Posner, Bauer, Evans

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.