Skip to main content
· 5/20/2005

United States v. Bette J. Pree, Also Known as Betts Pree

Citations

  • 408 F.3d 855
  • 95 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 2491
  • 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 9222
  • 2005 WL 1243357

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “It is well established that the nature of a summary witness’ testimony requires that he draw conclusions from the evidence presented at trial.” (citation, quotation marks, and alteration omitted)
  • claim premised on new rule announced after defendant filed original briefs on appeal reviewed for plain error despite defendant’s having failed to raise claim at trial or in original appellate briefs

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Coffey, Ripple, Kanne

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.