Skip to main content
· 5/8/2001

United States v. David Lane McGlothlin

Citations

  • 249 F.3d 783
  • 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 8515
  • 2001 WL 476912

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the MVRA “require[s] the district court to set a detailed payment schedule at sentencing”
  • holding the district court must fashion a payment schedule designating a specific percentage of the prisoner’s monthly earnings to go toward his restitution obligation
  • reversing lump-sum payment order where defendant “had no ability to pay the restitution immediately,” and requiring District Court to set a periodic payment schedule
  • stating district court must set the manner of payments and length of time over which payments shall be made
  • stating district court must set the manner of payments and length of time over which payments shall be made
  • stating district court must set the manner of payments and length of time over which payments shall be made

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wollman, Hansen, Jones

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.