Skip to main content
· 12/14/1989

United States v. Leland L. Studley

Citations

  • 892 F.2d 518
  • 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 19045
  • 1989 WL 150510

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming the district court’s denial of a motion for a continuance where the defendant’s insistence on proceeding pro se until one week before trial played a significant part in undermining the ability of newly-appointed counsel to prepare for trial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Coffey, Posner, Wood

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.