· 2/25/2000
United States v. Olusola A. Alalade, A/K/A George Alalade
Citations
- 204 F.3d 536
- 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 2791
- 2000 WL 220316
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the MVRA does not vest district courts with discretion to reduce the amount of restitution below the full amount of each victim’s losses
- holding that the MVRA does not vest district courts with discretion to reduce the amount of restitution below the full amount of each victim’s losses
- holding that “the plain language of the MVRA did not grant the district court discretion to reduce the amount of restitution” by the amount ordered to be forfeited
- concluding that the plain language of the MVRA, as compared to the Victim Witness Protection Act, does not grant the district court to reduce a restitution award by the value of property subject to administrative forfeiture
- noting that the plain .language of the restitution. statute does not grant the district court discretion to reduce.the amount of restitution by the amount ordered to be forfeited
- noting that the plain language of the restitution statute does not grant the district court discretion to reduce the amount of restitution by the amount ordered to be forfeited
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Niemeyer, Williams, Hamilton
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.