Skip to main content
Fifth Circuit· 1/9/1996

United States v. Fields

Citations

  • 72 F.3d 1200
  • 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 265
  • 1996 WL 6964

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that district court remedied any prejudicial effect by instructing jury to limit its consideration of the evidence to the appropriate defendant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Garza, Jolly, Duhé

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

68 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

45 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.