United States v. Joseph Ebron

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the district court did not abuse its discretion in allowing the Government to inquire on redirect about a specific instance of prior conduct when on cross the defendant had opened the door to the issue
• determining that, although court in Williamson pro- nounced broad rule, ‘‘its analysis is predicated on the assumption that the challenged statement was a [postar- rest] confession’’
• prosecutor called defendant a “predator” and compared him to lions and tigers in the jungle stalking animals to kill
• District Court did not abuse its discretion in excusing juror on basis of her lack of candor and failure to abide by court’s instructions
• “In this case, the cumulative error doctrine does not apply for one simple reason: there is nothing to cumulate.”
• wounds “were consistent with a victim being restrained from behind while being stabbed from the front”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).