United States v. Ruben Horacio Gallardo-Trapero, David Christopher Hernandez, and Luis Quintero De Avila

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that \a prosecutor's closing argument cannot roam beyond the evidence presented during trial\
• holding that \a prosecutor's closing argument cannot roam beyond the evidence presented during trial\
• holding prosecutor’s improper vouching did not constitute reversible error because of overwhelming evidence supporting conviction
• determining that a generalized instruction to the jury to base its decision solely upon the testimony and evidence presented helped to mitigate any prejudicial effect
• stating that it is improper to invoke \the aegis of a governmental imprimatur\ to bolster witness credibility
• determining that prosecutor’s improper vouching did not taint “strident advocacy on both sides of this case and the numerous witnesses, pieces of evidence, and issues placed before the jury”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).