United States v. Pablo Salinas Brito Adrian Brito Jesus Salinas Brito Adan Brito Ignacio Berumez Brito Benjamin Hernandez Rodriguez

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that erroneous admission of extrinsic evidence was harmless error in part because the government did not refer to the evidence in its closing argument
• holding that the defendant was not entitled to a new trial where jury had general discussion of penalty during deliberations but there was no evidence that jury learned of information from an outside source
• holding that the defendant was not entitled to a new trial where jury had general discussion of penalty during deliberations but there was no evidence that jury learned of information from an outside source
• noting that this court has already held that section 848 is not unconstitutionally vague and rejecting the defendant’s vagueness challenge to the term “substantial”
• indicating that it is “well settled” that this court dismisses lesser-included offenses in cases of double jeopardy that arise from simultaneous charging of both greater and lesser- included offenses
• calling the product of the number of loads and the estimated minimum weight per load “the most conservative calculation” of the amount of drugs

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).