United States v. Amy Ralston Pofahl, Charles T. Nunn, and Randy White

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that an affidavit detailing the defendant's \involvement in a long-standing drug trafficking operation\ involving large quantities of drugs, along with certain continued conduct at the defendant's new residence, was not a bare-bones affidavit
• stating that Miranda warnings must be given prior to custodial interrogation
• noting in this context that “the mere presence of a spillover effect does not ordinarily warrant severance”
• affirming district court’s denial of a minor-participant reduction where defendant acted as a courier at least twice, recruited an individual to participate in the conspiracy, and received large payments for his work
• “The rule, rather than the exception, is that persons indicted together should be tried together, especially in conspiracy cases.”
• cert. denied by Nunn v. U.S., 510 U.S. 898, 114 S.Ct. 266, 126 L.Ed.2d 218 (1993)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).