United States v. Rosalba Solivan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an admonition that came after a twenty minute break was not swift enough for curative instruction to be sufficient because improper statement had been \etched in granite\ in the jurors' minds
• holding that an admonition that came after a twenty minute break was not swift enough for curative instruction to be sufficient because improper statement had been “etched in granite” in the jurors’ minds
• holding that comments that implied that the drug trade would continue if the jury did not convict the defendant were improper
• holding that comments that implied that the drug trade would continue if the jury did not convict the defendant were improper
• holding that egregious prosecutorial misconduct constituted error when in closing the prosecutor asked the jury to “tell [defendant] and all of the other drug dealers like her ... that we don’t want that stuff in Northern Kentucky. ...”
• holding that egregious prosecutorial misconduct constituted error when in closing the prosecutor asked the jury to \tell [defendant] and all of the other drug dealers like her . . . that we don't want that stuff in Northern Kentucky . . . .\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).