United States v. Ruben Rocha, Thomas Padilla, Hector Garcia-Garcia, Johnny Robert Hinojosa, and Jose Santos Gallegos

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “severance is not required merely because the Government introduced evidence admissible only against individual co-defendants”
• holding district judge’s comment was attempt to explain to jury why session ended early, not remark on defendant’s failure to testify
• noting that the presence of a gun carried by a fellow conspirator supported a finding that defendant carried a weapon “during and in relation to” a drug trafficking crime
• noting that the sentencing guidelines are subject to the rules of statutory construction
• noting that the sentencing guidelines are subject to the rules of statutory construction
• noting that the sentencing guidelines are subject to the rules of statutory construction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).