United States v. DeSilva

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Accordingly, because of this finding, remand to the [AJgency for further review is an unnecessary formality.” (emphasis added) (citations and quotation marks omitted)
• the Agency failed to adequately explain why certain materials were not considered to be reliable evidence
• the Agency erred in applying the “reliable evidence” standard to its determination of whether ABA therapy was “medically or psychologically necessary” or “appropriate medical care”
• the Agency failed to satisfactorily explain how its determination that ABA was educational rather than medical was rationally related to the evidence before it
• the Agency did not properly apply its own regulations requiring a comparison of a contested treatment to “the standard means of treatment”
• the Agency failed to give proper consideration to the statutory purpose

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).