· 1/31/2012
Dale Atkins v. Richard Brown
Citations
- 667 F.3d 939
- 2012 WL 272848
- 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 1765
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- applying § 2254(d) deference to a claim addressed “in one form or another” by both the state trial court and the state appellate court
- when counsel makes a rea- sonable strategic decision, it is “not subject to Monday-morn- ing quarterbacking”
- “Importantly, [j]udicial scrutiny of counsel's performance must be highly deferential, indulging a strong presumption of effectiveness to combat the distorting effects of hindsight.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Posner, Kanne, Pratt
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.