Skip to main content
· 1/31/2012

Dale Atkins v. Richard Brown

Citations

  • 667 F.3d 939
  • 2012 WL 272848
  • 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 1765

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • applying § 2254(d) deference to a claim addressed “in one form or another” by both the state trial court and the state appellate court
  • when counsel makes a rea- sonable strategic decision, it is “not subject to Monday-morn- ing quarterbacking”
  • “Importantly, [j]udicial scrutiny of counsel's performance must be highly deferential, indulging a strong presumption of effectiveness to combat the distorting effects of hindsight.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Posner, Kanne, Pratt

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.