Tenth Circuit· 7/6/2005
United States v. Smith
Citations
- 413 F.3d 1253
- 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 13389
- 2005 WL 1566739
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that the purpose element could consist of maintenance of the group’s fearsome reputation through acts of violence
- concluding that the purpose element could consist of maintenance of the group's fearsome reputation through acts of violence
- noting the “extensive testimony” that “acts of violence were a common part of [the gang’s] culture”
- noting the “extensive testimony” that “acts of violence were a common part of [the gang’s] culture”
- noting the “exten- sive testimony” that “acts of violence were a common part of [the gang’s] culture”
- noting the “exten- sive testimony” that “acts of violence were a common part of [the gang’s] culture”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Tacha, McKay, Ebel
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
58 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. Neyland (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2014-05-08· cited 181×
- Maynard v. BooneTenth Circuit· 2006-10-26· cited 122×
- United States v. HutchinsonTenth Circuit· 2009-07-27· cited 100×
- United States v. BanksNinth Circuit· 2008-01-29· cited 97×
- United States v. VisinaizTenth Circuit· 2005-11-16· cited 90×
- United States v. TaylorTenth Circuit· 2008-01-29· cited 77×
- United States v. SimpsonTenth Circuit· 2017-01-10· cited 76×
- United States v. AryTenth Circuit· 2008-03-04· cited 67×
- State v. KnuffOhio Supreme Court· 2024-03-14· cited 63×
- United States v. BaderTenth Circuit· 2012-05-03· cited 60×
- United States v. KamaheleTenth Circuit· 2014-04-08· cited 56×
- United States v. FishmanTenth Circuit· 2011-05-27· cited 50×
- CoStar Realty Information, Inc. v. FieldD. Maryland· 2009-03-31· cited 45×
- United States v. GarciaTenth Circuit· 2015-07-14· cited 42×
- United States v. HarrisTenth Circuit· 2012-09-18· cited 40×
- United States v. RobinsonTenth Circuit· 2009-10-20· cited 38×
- United States v. GillespieTenth Circuit· 2006-06-30· cited 37×
- United States v. RandallTenth Circuit· 2011-11-01· cited 34×
- United States v. DeSilvaSeventh Circuit· 2007-10-12· cited 34×
- Johnson v. HeathTenth Circuit· 2022-12-28· cited 29×
Cites
53 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court· 1993-06-28· cited 21,376×
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1975-06-30· cited 11,585×
- Sedima, S. P. R. L. v. Imrex Co.Supreme Court· 1985-07-01· cited 3,595×
- United States v. CottonSupreme Court· 2002-05-20· cited 3,303×
- United States v. LopezSupreme Court· 1995-04-26· cited 3,052×
- H. J. Inc. v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court· 1989-06-26· cited 2,771×
- United States v. TurketteSupreme Court· 1981-06-17· cited 2,648×
- McKaskle v. WigginsSupreme Court· 1984-01-23· cited 2,288×
- Nardone v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1939-12-11· cited 1,927×
- Godinez v. MoranSupreme Court· 1993-06-24· cited 1,916×
- Weatherford v. BurseySupreme Court· 1977-02-22· cited 1,807×
- United States v. MorrisonSupreme Court· 2000-05-15· cited 1,467×
- Salinas v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1997-12-02· cited 1,039×
- United States v. FeolaSupreme Court· 1975-03-19· cited 856×
- United States v. Gary Allen Lott, United States of America v. Johnny Marton Lott, AKA Johnny Martin LottTenth Circuit· 2002-11-05· cited 690×
- Michael E. Moss v. Morgan Stanley Inc., E. Jacques Courtois, Jr., Adrian Antoniu, and James M. Newman, Morgan Stanley Inc. And James M. NewmanSecond Circuit· 1983-09-09· cited 535×
- United States v. Manuel Concepcion, Roberto Aponte, and Nelson FriasSecond Circuit· 1993-03-25· cited 425×
- United States v. Gurmeet Singh DhinsaSecond Circuit· 2001-03-21· cited 364×
- United States v. David Thai, Lan Ngoc Tran, Minh Do, Jimmy Nguyen, Hoang Huy Ngo, Quang Van Nguyen, and Lv Hong, A/K/A \l.v. Hong\Second Circuit· 1994-07-11· cited 322×
- United States v. DardenEighth Circuit· 1995-11-22· cited 301×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.