United States v. Louis James

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that where defendant’s associates had testified to his ownership of several guns, the government had met its burden by showing that one of those gun and drugs attributed to the defendant were found in the same shoebox
• noting that a failure to object to evidence at trial results in forfeiture
• finding evidence of drugs seized one month after drug offense for which defendant was indicted not intricately related to charged conduct
• finding evidence of drugs seized one month after drug offense for which defendant was indicted not intricately related to charged conduct
• finding evidence of drugs seized one month after drug offense for which defendant was indicted not intricately related to charged conduct
• “[T]his theory of defense was intrinsically part of the charge and the failure to provide these instructions did not deny [the defendant] a fair trial.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).