Skip to main content
· 6/13/2005

United States v. Kendrick Weatherspoon

Citations

  • 410 F.3d 1142
  • 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 11053
  • 2005 WL 1384341

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the “ethical bar is set higher for the prosecutor than for the criminal defense lawyer”
  • explaining that vouching is forbidden because a jury “may be inclined to give weight to the prosecutor’s opinion ... instead of making the independent judgment of credibility to which the defendant is entitled”
  • condemning “prosecutorial statements designed to appeal to the passions, fears and vulnerabilities of the jury”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Trott, McKeown, Shadur

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.