D.C. Circuit· 7/21/2006
United States v. Carson, Samuel
Citations
- 455 F.3d 336
- 372 U.S. App. D.C. 251
- 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 18361
- 2006 WL 2034361
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that “the grant of relief under Rule 14 lies within the discretion of the trial judge and refusal to sever counts ... properly joined under Rule 8 will be reversed only if discretion was abused” (alteration in original) (citations omitted)
- “We review the court’s legal conclusions regarding the Confrontation Clause and Rule 804(b)(6) de novo and its factual findings for clear error.”
- allegation that offenses were overt acts in furtherance of conspiracy “provided the necessary link to satisfy Rule 8(b)”
- adopting James’ holding without further analysis
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Henderson, Randolph, Griffith
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
87 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- United States v. Jon ProvanceFourth Circuit· 2019-12-03· cited 282×
- Ralls Corp. v. Committee on Foreign Investment in the United StatesD.C. Circuit· 2014-07-15· cited 216×
- United States v. MooreD.C. Circuit· 2011-07-29· cited 183×
- Arkan Ali v. Donald RumsfeldD.C. Circuit· 2011-06-21· cited 172×
- United States v. WilsonD.C. Circuit· 2010-05-25· cited 144×
- Potter v. District of ColumbiaD.C. Circuit· 2009-03-06· cited 141×
- United States v. Keith McGillD.C. Circuit· 2016-03-01· cited 135×
- National Institute of Military Justice v. United States Department of DefenseD.C. Circuit· 2008-01-11· cited 103×
- United States v. Tavon MouzoneFourth Circuit· 2012-07-26· cited 101×
- United States v. CelisD.C. Circuit· 2010-06-18· cited 90×
- United States v. AdefehintiD.C. Circuit· 2007-12-18· cited 83×
- United States v. JohnsonEighth Circuit· 2007-07-30· cited 75×
- United States v. MahdiD.C. Circuit· 2010-03-30· cited 73×
- United States v. RossSeventh Circuit· 2007-12-14· cited 59×
- Loni Czekalski v. Raymond LaHoodD.C. Circuit· 2009-12-29· cited 56×
- Peacher v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court· 2013-02-21· cited 54×
- Rasul v. MyersD.C. Circuit· 2008-01-11· cited 50×
- United States v. Luis GarciaSeventh Circuit· 2014-06-13· cited 49×
- United States v. Ernest GloverD.C. Circuit· 2012-06-05· cited 47×
- United States v. Bryan BostickD.C. Circuit· 2015-06-26· cited 45×
Cites
124 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1963-05-13· cited 33,902×
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court· 2000-06-26· cited 28,372×
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court· 2004-10-01· cited 23,210×
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 2004-03-08· cited 14,756×
- Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1968-06-17· cited 8,792×
- Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court· 1986-04-07· cited 7,102×
- Liteky v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1994-03-07· cited 7,016×
- Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court· 1974-02-27· cited 5,953×
- Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court· 1980-06-25· cited 5,425×
- Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court· 1965-04-05· cited 4,761×
- Singleton v. WulffSupreme Court· 1976-07-01· cited 3,831×
- Malloy v. HoganSupreme Court· 1964-06-15· cited 3,675×
- Illinois v. AllenSupreme Court· 1970-04-06· cited 3,248×
- Griffin v. BreckenridgeSupreme Court· 1971-06-07· cited 3,211×
- Pinkerton v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1946-10-14· cited 3,200×
- United States v. LopezSupreme Court· 1995-04-26· cited 3,052×
- Snyder v. MassachusettsSupreme Court· 1934-01-08· cited 2,822×
- Richardson v. MarshSupreme Court· 1987-04-21· cited 2,670×
- Bourjaily v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1987-06-23· cited 2,639×
- United States v. Grinnell Corp.Supreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 2,474×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.