United States v. Carson, Samuel

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “the grant of relief under Rule 14 lies within the discretion of the trial judge and refusal to sever counts ... properly joined under Rule 8 will be reversed only if discretion was abused” (alteration in original) (citations omitted)
• “We review the court’s legal conclusions regarding the Confrontation Clause and Rule 804(b)(6) de novo and its factual findings for clear error.”
• allegation that offenses were overt acts in furtherance of conspiracy “provided the necessary link to satisfy Rule 8(b)”
• adopting James’ holding without further analysis

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).