· 7/9/2003
United States v. Abraham Hernandez
Citations
- 330 F.3d 964
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- reasoning that Apprendi is inapplicable when the defendant is sen- tenced below the statutory maximum for the charged offense
- reasoning that Apprendi is inapplicable when the defendant is sentenced below the statutory maximum for the charged offense
- upholding the admission of gang violence evidence where it was comparatively slight in light of the length of trial
- finding no plain error when jury instructions omitted the statute’s scienter requirement of “intentionally” and only included “knowingly” when other words used in the instructions were sufficient to convey the requisite mental state
- upholding the 10 Nos. 03-1838, 03-1849 & 03-1878 admission of gang violence evidence where it was compara- tively slight in light of the length of trial
- applying § 5G1.2(d) when the Guidelines range was 30 years to life, and the statutory maximum penalty on each of the four counts of conviction was 20 years
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Posner, Ripple, Kanne
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.