Skip to main content
· 12/9/2005

United States v. Ramiro R. Urbina, United States of America v. Ramiro R. Urbina

Citations

  • 431 F.3d 305
  • 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 26898

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • considering the defendant’s opportunity to cross-examine an agent’s expert drug testimony in finding no abuse of discretion in its admittance
  • considering the defendant’s opportunity to cross-examine an agent’s expert drug testimony in finding no abuse of discretion in its admittance
  • upholding a search based upon consent when a drug dog was present at the scene, but not utilized because the defendant consented to a search
  • “We measure the scope of consent under the Fourth Amendment using a standard of objective reasonableness, considering what an objectively reasonable person would have understood the consent to include.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Arnold, McMillian, Colloton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.