· 12/9/2005
United States v. Ramiro R. Urbina, United States of America v. Ramiro R. Urbina
Citations
- 431 F.3d 305
- 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 26898
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- considering the defendant’s opportunity to cross-examine an agent’s expert drug testimony in finding no abuse of discretion in its admittance
- considering the defendant’s opportunity to cross-examine an agent’s expert drug testimony in finding no abuse of discretion in its admittance
- upholding a search based upon consent when a drug dog was present at the scene, but not utilized because the defendant consented to a search
- “We measure the scope of consent under the Fourth Amendment using a standard of objective reasonableness, considering what an objectively reasonable person would have understood the consent to include.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Arnold, McMillian, Colloton
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.