UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, — v. MELVIN LUIS VELAZQUEZ-RIVERA, —

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that testimony explaining how the police came to be surveilling a particular location based on an informant’s tip was not hearsay
• explaining that probable cause was supported by informant’s tips that the police corroborated and by the defendant’s attempts to evade the police by “evasive driving” and disguising himself
• upholding strike where the juror was struck, in part, because she was a nurse
• efforts at flight and evasion combined with corroborated informant’s tip established probable cause

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).