United States v. Deon Love

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a diagnosis of impaired memory five years earlier was LAM V. ACOSTA 39 not too remote to be admissible
• concluding that error was not harmless in part because if the witness's testimony was disregarded, \the government [was] left with less than overwhelming evidence of [defendant]'s guilt\
• concluding that error was not harmless in part because if the witness’s testimony was disregarded, “the government [was] left with less than overwhelming evidence of [defendant]’s guilt”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).