United States v. William King, Jr.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that it takes “exceptional circumstances” to reverse based on an improper statement made during closing argument
• recognizing limiting instructions' role in preventing jury from giving inappropriate consideration to out-of-court statements
• no automatic reduction for defendant who pleads guilty
• “without foundation” standard for reversal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).