William Frank Loeblein v. Dave Dormire

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding victim’s testimony was sufficient to sustain sexual assault conviction, although it “did not correlate precisely with some of her out-of-court statements”
• rejecting sufficiency challenge on habeas review where trial included conflicting evidence because jury was entitled to make credibility determinations
• “[A] state court’s 25 failure properly to apply a state statute of limitations does not violate due process or, indeed, any other 26 provision of the Constitution or a federal statute.”
• “[A] state court’s failure properly to apply a state statute of limitations does not violate due process or . . . any other provision of the Constitution or a federal statute.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).