Indiana Court of Appeals· 6/13/2008

Lindsey v. State

Citations

888 N.E.2d 319
2008 Ind. App. LEXIS 1254
2008 WL 2390726

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

noting that if an issue was raised on direct appeal, but decided adversely, it is res judicata
noting a claim of fundamental error on post-conviction can only be made in the context of an ineffective assistance claim or if the issue was demonstrably unavailable at the time of trial and direct appeal
issues available on post-conviction limited to ineffective assistance of counsel and issues unavailable to petitioner on direct appeal that resulted in fundamental error
“Section 18 applies only to the penal code as a whole and not to individual sentences.”
“[a] defendant in a post-conviction proceeding may allege a claim of fundamental error only when asserting either (1) deprivation of the Sixth Amendment right to effective assistance of counsel, or (2

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Najam, Darden, Brown

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

40 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

31 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.