Skip to main content

Thompson v. Thompson

Citations

  • 811 N.E.2d 888
  • 2004 Ind. App. LEXIS 1373
  • 2004 WL 1575773

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that a jail sentence was improperly imposed for indirect civil contempt where “the trial court did not condition [the contemnor’s] jail sentence upon . . . compliance with its orders”
  • holding that two-week jail sentence for contempt was illegal where trial court failed to include provision allowing defendant to purge himself of contempt and forgo jail sentence by complying with trial court’s order
  • concluding that appellant was not entitled to evidentiary hearing on his Rule 60(B)(1) motion based on excusable neglect where he alleged that his attorney was negligent but attorney negligence will not support a finding of excusable neglect as a matter of law
  • providing that generally the marital estate closes on the date the dissolution petition was filed and debts incurred by one party after that point are not to be included in the marital estate
  • noting that Trial Rule 60(D) generally requires trial courts to hold a hearing on any pertinent evidence before granting Trial Rule 60(B) relief, but that when there is no pertinent evidence to be heard, a hearing is unnecessary
  • finding sentence for civil contempt was punitive where trial court failed to indicate that party could purge itself of punishment and forego jail sentence by complying with its orders

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Mathias, Sharpnack, Vaidik

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

98 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

98 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.