Skip to main content
· 8/17/2006

Marriage of Kondamuri v. Kondamuri

Citations

  • 852 N.E.2d 939
  • 2006 Ind. App. LEXIS 1594
  • 2006 WL 2371949

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding property transferred by a spouse to avoid support obligation may be considered on the issue of property distribution as well as alimony
  • declining father’s request to reweigh conflicting evidence and affirming the award of physical custody to mother
  • noting that gambling winnings are taxable income
  • \A judgment is clearly erroneous if it applies the wrong legal standard to properly found facts.\
  • “The trial court has discretion to impute potential income to a parent if it is convinced the parent’s underemployment ‘has been contrived for the sole purpose of evading support obligations.’ ”
  • to determine whether the findings or judgment are clearly erroneous, we consider only the evidence favorable to the judgment and all reasonable inferences flowing therefrom, and will not reweigh the evidence or assess witness credibility

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Darden, Riley, Vaidik

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.