· 12/7/2015
Brad Barton v. Alexandra Barton
Citations
- 47 N.E.3d 368
- 2015 Ind. App. LEXIS 738
- 2015 WL 7983011
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the trial court is not required to split the marital assets equally so long as it states its reasons for the unequal division of property and the division is just and reasonable
- holding trial court did not abuse discretion in ordering husband to pay wife’s attorney fees because husband’s misconduct resulted in wife incurring additional litigation expenses and husband enjoyed greater earning capacity than wife
- factors trial court must consider when evaluating attorney’s fees requests in marital dissolution proceedings include the parties’ relative resources, economic condition, employability, and earnings potential
- “Misconduct that directly results in additional litigation expenses may properly be taken into account in the trial court’s decision to award attorney’s fees.”
- “The dissolution court should have included the entire present value of . . . the pension . . . in the marital estate (one pot theory
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Crone, Bradford
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.