Skip to main content
· 10/30/1996

In Re the Marriage of Coyle

Citations

  • 671 N.E.2d 938
  • 1996 Ind. App. LEXIS 1478
  • 1996 WL 625931

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[T]ransactions which occur during the breakdown of the marriage, just prior to filing a petition or during the pendency of an action, may require heightened scrutiny.”
  • “The [Indiana] statute directs the trial court to examine the conduct of the parties ‘during the marriage,’ so that the court is not limited to an examination of any particular time period.” (citation omitted)
  • “Even a sharp disagreement between spouses over the wisdom of an expenditure, without more, does not render that expenditure a dissipation of marital assets .... The test is whether the asset was actually wasted or misused.”
  • “The non-dissipating party’s participation in or consent to the expenditure is a relevant consideration.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Najam, Baker, Garrard

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.