Skip to main content

Hill v. Hill

Citations

  • 863 N.E.2d 456
  • 2007 Ind. App. LEXIS 581
  • 2007 WL 959086

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding pension plan was an asset when party was receiving payments at time of dissolution
  • determining that a “pension . . . was properly included in the marital pot” where a spouse was “currently receiving payments from his pension plan”
  • finding that husband’s pension was marital property subject to division because he was currently receiving payments from his pension plan at the time of dissolution and clearly has “a present right to withdraw pension or retirement benefits”
  • retirement plan was not a marital asset because it had not vested at the time of dissolution

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Vaidik, Bailey, Barnes

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

27 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.