Skip to main content
· 11/17/2005

Balicki v. Balicki

Citations

  • 837 N.E.2d 532
  • 2005 Ind. App. LEXIS 2169
  • 2005 WL 3071588

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that no remand required where there was no evidence by any appraiser as to value of any personal goodwill in business
  • holding husband invited alleged error in including asset in marital estate by expressly indicating to trial court that it was a marital asset
  • observing that the doctrine of invited error is grounded in estoppel and prevents a party from taking advantage of error he or she commits, invites or is the natural consequence of his or her own negligence or misconduct
  • generally, there is no abuse of discretion if a trial court’s chosen valuation is within the range of values supported by the evidence
  • Court of Appeals remanding for clarification where trial court’s findings failed to address issue

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Barnes, Crone, Najam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.