Castaneda v. Castaneda

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that trial court did not abuse discretion in setting aside inheritance exclusively to wife where it was kept in wife’s name separate from husband and husband did not contribute to accumulation of the property
• upholding award of inheritance solely to wife, even though it was included in the marital pot
• finding no basis to conclude that the wife was underemployed for child support purposes where she worked part-time to care for the children
• stating the sums acquired by wife through inheritance were “required to be included in the marital pot and available for division by the trial court” and declining husband’s “invitation to read [the trial court’s order] as excluding the inheritance from the pot”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).