Skip to main content

O'Connell v. O'Connell

Citations

  • 889 N.E.2d 1
  • 2008 Ind. App. LEXIS 1324
  • 2008 WL 2439902

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • court violated the one-pot theory when it did not consider and divide property owned before marriage

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Darden, Najam, Brown

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

23 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.