Court of Appeals of Maryland· 10/26/2012
Thomas v. State
Citations
- 429 Md. 246
- 55 A.3d 680
- 2012 WL 5275184
- 2012 Md. LEXIS 685
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a confession does not per se render a suspect in custody, especially where the atmosphere of the room never changed
- holding that a confession does not per se render a suspect in custody, especially where the atmosphere of the room never changed
- holding that a confession does not per se render a suspect in custody, and once defendant confessed, the atmosphere of the room never changed; thus, admission did not render defendant in custody
- concluding that, “although the police 9 never uttered the talismanic words ‘you are free to go,’” Thomas was not in custody for Miranda purposes and the circuit court judge erred in granting the motion to suppress
- noting that when a suspect is arrested at the end of an interview that does not demonstrate that he was in custody prior to the arrest
- noting that when a suspect is arrested at the end of an interview that does not demonstrate that he was in custody prior to the arrest
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Adkins, Battaglia, Bell
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
15 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Green v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2017-10-20· cited 12×
- Madrid v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2021-07-09· cited 12×
- Moody v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2013-01-23· cited 9×
- Paige v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2015-11-30· cited 7×
- Brown v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2017-03-27· cited 7×
- Edwards v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2017-05-24· cited 7×
- Norwood v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2015-04-29· cited 6×
- Aguilera-Tovar v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2012-12-20· cited 4×
- Alford v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2018-03-02· cited 3×
- State v. RogersCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2019-03-28· cited 1×
- Mario M. Mills v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court· 2022-12-13· cited 1×
- State v. Daniel J. H. BarteltWisconsin Supreme Court· 2018-02-20
- Rodriguez v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2023-06-01
- Riley v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2025-08-27
- Campbell v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2025-10-02
Cites
50 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court· 1980-05-12· cited 5,571×
- Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court· 1984-07-02· cited 4,856×
- Yarborough v. AlvaradoSupreme Court· 2004-06-01· cited 3,494×
- Oregon v. MathiasonSupreme Court· 1977-01-25· cited 2,680×
- Stansbury v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1994-04-26· cited 2,603×
- Silverthorne Lumber Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1920-03-01· cited 2,373×
- California v. BehelerSupreme Court· 1983-07-06· cited 2,048×
- Dickerson v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2000-06-26· cited 1,932×
- Thompson v. KeohaneSupreme Court· 1995-11-29· cited 1,729×
- New York v. QuarlesSupreme Court· 1984-06-12· cited 1,468×
- Howes v. FieldsSupreme Court· 2012-02-21· cited 785×
- Maryland v. ShatzerSupreme Court· 2010-02-24· cited 624×
- J. D. B. v. North CarolinaSupreme Court· 2011-06-16· cited 563×
- United States v. Leonard David GriffinEighth Circuit· 1990-12-28· cited 292×
- United States v. CraigheadNinth Circuit· 2008-08-21· cited 190×
- Riddick v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1990-04-11· cited 173×
- Cartnail v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2000-06-14· cited 129×
- Hunter v. StateAlaska Supreme Court· 1979-02-16· cited 112×
- State v. PinderSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1999-08-24· cited 103×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.