Skip to main content

Thomas v. State

Citations

  • 429 Md. 246
  • 55 A.3d 680
  • 2012 WL 5275184
  • 2012 Md. LEXIS 685

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a confession does not per se render a suspect in custody, especially where the atmosphere of the room never changed
  • holding that a confession does not per se render a suspect in custody, especially where the atmosphere of the room never changed
  • holding that a confession does not per se render a suspect in custody, and once defendant confessed, the atmosphere of the room never changed; thus, admission did not render defendant in custody
  • concluding that, “although the police 9 never uttered the talismanic words ‘you are free to go,’” Thomas was not in custody for Miranda purposes and the circuit court judge erred in granting the motion to suppress
  • noting that when a suspect is arrested at the end of an interview that does not demonstrate that he was in custody prior to the arrest
  • noting that when a suspect is arrested at the end of an interview that does not demonstrate that he was in custody prior to the arrest

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Adkins, Battaglia, Bell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

50 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.