Court of Appeals of Maryland· 5/24/2017
Edwards v. State
Citations
- 160 A.3d 642
- 453 Md. 174
- 2017 Md. LEXIS 338
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding reasonable probability where the item requested for DNA testing was within “physical proximity” of the crime and handled by the perpetrator immediately before the crime occurred
- finding reasonable probability where the item requested for DNA testing was within “physical proximity” of the crime and handled by the perpetrator immediately before the crime occurred
- “The statute was enacted . . . to provide an avenue for the exoneration of the actually innocent.” (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)
- “The statute was enacted . . . to provide an avenue for the exoneration of the actually innocent.” (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)
- “Because we are asked to interpret the language in the post- conviction DNA testing statute, . . . our review is plenary.” (footnote and citations omitted)
- “Because we are asked to interpret the language in the post- conviction DNA testing statute, . . . our review is plenary.” (footnote and citations omitted)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Barbera, Greene, Adkins, McDonald, Watts, Hotten, Getty
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Beaman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2017-06-21· cited 5×
- Satterfield v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2023-09-05· cited 4×
- Lee v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2023-03-28
- Satterfield v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2023-04-24
- Matthews v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2024-03-25
- Cook v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2024-08-20
Cites
22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Blake v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2006-10-24· cited 82×
- Arrington v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2009-11-17· cited 49×
- Gregg v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2009-07-24· cited 38×
- Commonwealth v. ReeseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1995-08-01· cited 37×
- Thompson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2006-10-24· cited 26×
- Ali v. CIT Technology Financing Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2010-10-21· cited 26×
- Bedingfield v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court· 2008-08-21· cited 24×
- Thompson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2009-11-16· cited 24×
- Fuster v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2014-04-22· cited 23×
- Thomas v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2012-10-26· cited 23×
- Brewer v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 2002-06-06· cited 19×
- Simms v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2009-07-24· cited 19×
- Washington v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2012-02-21· cited 17×
- In Re BradfordCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2007-08-14· cited 17×
- State v. HernandezSupreme Court of Kansas· 2016-01-15· cited 17×
- In re the Personal Restraint of BradfordCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2007-08-14· cited 17×
- Wallace v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2017-04-21· cited 16×
- Jackson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2016-06-23· cited 13×
- Howard v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2014-11-19· cited 11×
- Jackson v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2012-09-05· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.