Skip to main content

Edwards v. State

Citations

  • 160 A.3d 642
  • 453 Md. 174
  • 2017 Md. LEXIS 338

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding reasonable probability where the item requested for DNA testing was within “physical proximity” of the crime and handled by the perpetrator immediately before the crime occurred
  • finding reasonable probability where the item requested for DNA testing was within “physical proximity” of the crime and handled by the perpetrator immediately before the crime occurred
  • “The statute was enacted . . . to provide an avenue for the exoneration of the actually innocent.” (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)
  • “The statute was enacted . . . to provide an avenue for the exoneration of the actually innocent.” (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)
  • “Because we are asked to interpret the language in the post- conviction DNA testing statute, . . . our review is plenary.” (footnote and citations omitted)
  • “Because we are asked to interpret the language in the post- conviction DNA testing statute, . . . our review is plenary.” (footnote and citations omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Barbera, Greene, Adkins, McDonald, Watts, Hotten, Getty

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.