Alaska Supreme Court· 2/16/1979
Hunter v. State
Citations
- 590 P.2d 888
- 1979 Alas. LEXIS 641
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- agreeing that the objective “reasonable person” test is the proper standard for determining custody
- agreeing that the objective “reasonable person” test is the proper standard for determining custody
- adopting an objective test for determining custody for purposes of Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966)
- establishing standards governing the determination of when a person is in custody for Miranda purposes
- describing an involuntary confession as one where \a defendant's will was overborne'\' by coercive tactics
- The question is not whether the particular defendant considered himself in custody, but whether a \reasonable person [under the same circumstances] would feel he was not free to leave and break off police questioning.\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Boochever, Boocheyer, Ra-Binowitz, Connor, Burke, Matthews
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
81 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Thompson v. KeohaneSupreme Court· 1995-11-29· cited 1,729×
- Frink v. StateAlaska Supreme Court· 1979-06-29· cited 121×
- Stone v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1979-05-30· cited 106×
- State v. RuckerCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2003-04-14· cited 81×
- Owens v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2007-06-05· cited 70×
- Lacquement v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska· 1982-04-22· cited 61×
- Quick v. StateAlaska Supreme Court· 1979-09-07· cited 57×
- Whitfield v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1980-02-15· cited 57×
- Palmer v. StateAlaska Supreme Court· 1979-12-28· cited 56×
- Doyle v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska· 1981-09-10· cited 49×
- Hintz v. StateAlaska Supreme Court· 1981-05-01· cited 48×
- Davis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska· 1981-05-21· cited 41×
- State v. MorinHawaii Supreme Court· 1990-01-26· cited 35×
- McMahan v. StateAlaska Supreme Court· 1980-10-10· cited 32×
- McConnell v. StateAlaska Supreme Court· 1979-05-04· cited 31×
- Eben v. StateAlaska Supreme Court· 1979-09-07· cited 30×
- Castillo v. StateAlaska Supreme Court· 1980-07-11· cited 29×
- Allen v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2004-09-02· cited 29×
- Stuart v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska· 1985-04-26· cited 28×
- State v. ShashatySupreme Court of Connecticut· 1987-08-18· cited 28×
Cites
72 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court· 1973-05-29· cited 11,783×
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1931-12-11· cited 10,676×
- Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1964-06-22· cited 5,250×
- Oregon v. MathiasonSupreme Court· 1977-01-25· cited 2,680×
- Hoffa v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1966-12-12· cited 2,107×
- Rogers v. RichmondSupreme Court· 1961-03-20· cited 1,412×
- Beckwith v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1976-04-21· cited 1,005×
- Mathis v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1968-05-06· cited 760×
- Orozco v. TexasSupreme Court· 1969-03-25· cited 661×
- Cooksey v. StateAlaska Supreme Court· 1974-07-19· cited 323×
- People v. ReedMichigan Supreme Court· 1975-01-21· cited 263×
- Whitton v. StateAlaska Supreme Court· 1970-12-23· cited 222×
- People v. Rodney P.(Anonymous)New York Court of Appeals· 1967-11-30· cited 196×
- United States v. Glenn W. HallSecond Circuit· 1970-03-23· cited 165×
- Waters v. StateAlaska Supreme Court· 1971-03-25· cited 161×
- People v. ArnoldCalifornia Supreme Court· 1967-04-24· cited 157×
- Oveson v. Municipality of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court· 1978-02-03· cited 154×
- Posey v. United StatesFifth Circuit· 1969-07-17· cited 142×
- Arnold Lowe v. United StatesNinth Circuit· 1969-02-25· cited 123×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.