Supreme Court· 6/16/2011
J. D. B. v. North Carolina
Citations
- 180 L. Ed. 2d 310
- 2011 U.S. LEXIS 4557
- 131 S. Ct. 2394
- 564 U.S. 261
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that courts should consider a youth’s age in determining a Fifth Amendment Miranda issue
- holding that neither officers nor courts may ignore “the effect of objective circumstances that, by their nature, are specific to children”
- holding that child’s age is relevant, although not necessarily determinative, in as sessing whether a child is in custody
- holding that neither officers nor courts may ignore “the effect of objective circumstances that, by their nature, are specific to children”
- holding that \the age of a child subjected to police questioning is relevant to the custody analysis of Miranda \
- holding that courts should consider a youth’s age in deter- mining a Fifth Amendment Miranda issue
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Alito, Breyer, Ginsburg, Kagan, Kennedy, Roberts, Scalia, Sotomayor, Thomas
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
352 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Miller v. AlabamaSupreme Court· 2012-06-25· cited 6,816×
- People v. GutierrezCalifornia Supreme Court· 2014-05-05· cited 935×
- Morgan v. SwansonFifth Circuit· 2011-09-27· cited 606×
- People v. RainerColorado Court of Appeals· 2013-04-11· cited 340×
- State v. Houston-SconiersWashington Supreme Court· 2017-03-02· cited 335×
- State v. LyleSupreme Court of Iowa· 2014-07-18· cited 301×
- Commonwealth v. YandamuriSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2017-04-26· cited 208×
- United States v. JayyousiEleventh Circuit· 2011-09-19· cited 202×
- Brendan Dassey v. Michael DittmannSeventh Circuit· 2017-12-08· cited 181×
- State v. Aalim (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2017-05-25· cited 154×
- Vega v. TekohSupreme Court· 2022-06-23· cited 149×
- United States v. BerriosThird Circuit· 2012-04-10· cited 137×
- Wyatt L. Bear CloudWyoming Supreme Court· 2014-09-10· cited 137×
- State of Iowa v. Keyon HarrisonSupreme Court of Iowa· 2018-06-22· cited 118×
- United States v. Tymond PrestonNinth Circuit· 2014-05-12· cited 117×
- The People v. Anthony N. PacherilleNew York Court of Appeals· 2015-05-12· cited 105×
- People v. NelsonCalifornia Supreme Court· 2012-01-12· cited 104×
- State v. LongOhio Supreme Court· 2014-03-12· cited 91×
- Commonwealth v. BonnerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2016-02-23· cited 91×
- State v. Moore (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2016-12-22· cited 90×
Cites
49 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 37,942×
- Gall v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2007-12-10· cited 20,598×
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court· 1973-05-29· cited 11,783×
- Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court· 1984-07-02· cited 4,856×
- Roper v. SimmonsSupreme Court· 2005-03-01· cited 3,523×
- Yarborough v. AlvaradoSupreme Court· 2004-06-01· cited 3,494×
- Graham v. FloridaSupreme Court· 2010-05-17· cited 3,477×
- Moran v. BurbineSupreme Court· 1986-03-10· cited 3,339×
- Eddings v. OklahomaSupreme Court· 1982-01-19· cited 3,271×
- Oregon v. ElstadSupreme Court· 1985-03-04· cited 2,824×
- Oregon v. MathiasonSupreme Court· 1977-01-25· cited 2,680×
- Stansbury v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1994-04-26· cited 2,603×
- California v. BehelerSupreme Court· 1983-07-06· cited 2,048×
- Renico v. LettSupreme Court· 2010-05-03· cited 1,940×
- Dickerson v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2000-06-26· cited 1,932×
- Fare v. Michael C.Supreme Court· 1979-10-01· cited 1,729×
- Thompson v. KeohaneSupreme Court· 1995-11-29· cited 1,729×
- Missouri v. SeibertSupreme Court· 2004-06-28· cited 1,541×
- New York v. QuarlesSupreme Court· 1984-06-12· cited 1,468×
Other cases named J. D. B. v. North Carolina
3 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.