Skip to main content
Supreme Court· 2/21/2012

Howes v. Fields

Citations

  • 132 S. Ct. 1181
  • 182 L. Ed. 2d 17
  • 565 U.S. 499
  • 2012 U.S. LEXIS 1077
  • 2012 WL 538280

Oral argument

Source: CourtListener oral-argument corpus (CC0).

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the defendant was not in police custody even though he could not have expected to be able to “roam free” following his choice to end the interview”
  • finding no custodial interrogation where two sheriff’s deputies interviewed inmate in a jail conference room for five to seven hours
  • emphasizing “undisputed fact that respondent was told that he was free to end the questioning and to return to his cell”
  • characterizing an interview’s duration of “between five and seven hours in the evening” as lending only “some support” to a determination of custody (emphasis added)
  • discussing the freedom- of-movement inquiry used to determine whether a defendant is in custody
  • “Miranda adopted a set of prophylactic measures designed to ward off the inherently compelling pressures of custodial interrogation . . . .” (simplified)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Alito, Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

372 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Howes v. Fields

4 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.