Supreme Court· 2/21/2012
Howes v. Fields
Citations
- 132 S. Ct. 1181
- 182 L. Ed. 2d 17
- 565 U.S. 499
- 2012 U.S. LEXIS 1077
- 2012 WL 538280
Oral argument
- ListenArgued54 min recording
Source: CourtListener oral-argument corpus (CC0).
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the defendant was not in police custody even though he could not have expected to be able to “roam free” following his choice to end the interview”
- finding no custodial interrogation where two sheriff’s deputies interviewed inmate in a jail conference room for five to seven hours
- emphasizing “undisputed fact that respondent was told that he was free to end the questioning and to return to his cell”
- characterizing an interview’s duration of “between five and seven hours in the evening” as lending only “some support” to a determination of custody (emphasis added)
- discussing the freedom- of-movement inquiry used to determine whether a defendant is in custody
- “Miranda adopted a set of prophylactic measures designed to ward off the inherently compelling pressures of custodial interrogation . . . .” (simplified)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Alito, Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
372 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- White v. WoodallSupreme Court· 2014-04-23· cited 2,146×
- People v. MarkoColorado Court of Appeals· 2015-10-08· cited 656×
- People v. HenryMichigan Court of Appeals· 2014-05-08· cited 259×
- v. DavisSupreme Court of Colorado· 2019-10-07· cited 235×
- Todd Peterson v. Timothy DoumaSeventh Circuit· 2014-05-06· cited 227×
- State of Texas v. Ortiz, OctavioCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2012-10-31· cited 190×
- Commonwealth v. KeatonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2012-05-30· cited 158×
- People v. CaroCalifornia Supreme Court· 2019-06-13· cited 150×
- Vega v. TekohSupreme Court· 2022-06-23· cited 149×
- State of Iowa v. Zyriah Henry Floyd SchlitterSupreme Court of Iowa· 2016-06-10· cited 146×
- People v. KrebsCalifornia Supreme Court· 2019-11-21· cited 125×
- People v. ElliottMichigan Supreme Court· 2013-06-25· cited 113×
- People v. MolanoCalifornia Supreme Court· 2019-06-27· cited 107×
- Tizon v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 2012-04-03· cited 106×
- Dishon McNary v. Marcus HardySeventh Circuit· 2013-02-26· cited 86×
- People v. BowenAppellate Court of Illinois· 2015-09-24· cited 76×
- Campbell v. BradshawSixth Circuit· 2012-03-20· cited 67×
- People v. CortezMichigan Court of Appeals· 2013-03-12· cited 66×
- Andrew v. WhiteSupreme Court· 2025-01-21· cited 63×
- Deck v. JenkinsNinth Circuit· 2014-09-29· cited 62×
Cites
17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 37,942×
- Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court· 2000-04-18· cited 15,929×
- Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1981-06-22· cited 6,931×
- Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court· 1984-07-02· cited 4,856×
- Yarborough v. AlvaradoSupreme Court· 2004-06-01· cited 3,494×
- Oregon v. MathiasonSupreme Court· 1977-01-25· cited 2,680×
- Stansbury v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1994-04-26· cited 2,603×
- California v. BehelerSupreme Court· 1983-07-06· cited 2,048×
- Thompson v. KeohaneSupreme Court· 1995-11-29· cited 1,729×
- New York v. QuarlesSupreme Court· 1984-06-12· cited 1,468×
- United States v. Detroit Timber & Lumber Co.Supreme Court· 1906-02-19· cited 1,300×
- Illinois v. PerkinsSupreme Court· 1990-06-04· cited 906×
- Mathis v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1968-05-06· cited 760×
- Maryland v. ShatzerSupreme Court· 2010-02-24· cited 624×
- Robert T. Mathis, Sr. v. United StatesFifth Circuit· 1967-05-25· cited 17×
- Fields v. HowesSixth Circuit· 2010-08-20· cited 13×
Other cases named Howes v. Fields
4 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.